Proteksi Radiasi Radiografi Thoraks Ibu Hamil: Studi Kasus Protokol Klinis dan Pasien Safety
Keywords:
Ibu Hamil, Keamanan Radiologi, Proteksi Radiasi, Pra-Operasi Caesar, Radiografi ThoraxAbstract
Latar belakang: Paparan radiasi pengion dalam pemeriksaan radiodiagnostik, termasuk radiografi thorax pada ibu hamil, memiliki risiko signifikan terhadap perkembangan janin. Upaya proteksi radiasi sangat penting untuk memastikan keamanan ibu dan janin, terutama dalam prosedur pra-operasi caesar. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penatalaksanaan pemeriksaan radiografi thorax pada ibu hamil pre-operasi caesar di Rumah Sakit Pusat Pertamina dan memastikan penerapan proteksi radiasi yang optimal. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara terstruktur, dan dokumentasi. Subjek penelitian termasuk pasien ibu hamil, tiga radiografer, dan seorang dokter radiolog. Hasil: Pemeriksaan radiografi thorax dilakukan dengan proyeksi Posterior Anterior (PA), menggunakan alat pelindung seperti apron timah untuk mengurangi paparan radiasi. Teknik pemeriksaan ini menggunakan faktor eksposi 96 kV dan 4 mAs dengan jarak fokus-film 150 cm, yang efektif dalam mengurangi dosis radiasi. Hasil pemeriksaan menunjukkan gambaran paru-paru dan jantung normal pada dua pasien yang diteliti. Kesimpulan: Penatalaksanaan pemeriksaan radiografi thorax pada ibu hamil pre-operasi caesar di Rumah Sakit Pusat Pertamina sesuai dengan protokol keamanan radiologi. Teknik yang digunakan serta penerapan proteksi radiasi telah sesuai dengan standar, memastikan pemeriksaan yang aman dan berkualitas.References
N. Milošević, S. Milanović, M. Dožić, and S. Sotjanović-Rundić, “Dilemma in radiological examinations of pregnant women,” Glas. javnog Zdr., 2023, doi: 10.5937/serbjph2302200m.
M. Silva and D. M. P. Aires, “Os Efeitos Biológicos Da Radiação Ionizante Na Gravidez,” vol. 8, p. 10, 2020, doi: 10.36607/refacer.v8i1.4488.
H. Zarghani and A. Amouzeshi, “A Narrative Review on the Radiation Risk of Medical Imaging for Traumatic Pregnant Patient and the Fetal Risks,” J. Surg. Trauma, 2018, doi: 10.32592/JSURGERY.2018.6.3.104.
P. Suwanbut, T. Liamsuwan, D. Nantajit, W. Masa-Nga, and C. Tannanonta, “Assessment of Fetal Dose and Health Effect to the Fetus from Breast Cancer Radiotherapy during Pregnancy,” Life, vol. 12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/life12010084.
C. Picone et al., “Dose Reduction Strategies for Pregnant Women in Emergency Settings,” J. Clin. Med., vol. 12, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jcm12051847.
A. Kamal, M. Khan, and N. Sadiq, “Radiation Exposure In Interventional Cardiology: Strategies For Reduction And Protection,” Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J., 2023, doi: 10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.518.
R. Loose et al., “Radiation dose management systems—requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 31, pp. 2106–2114, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07290-x.
R. J. Limbong, S. Masrochah, and N. Sulaksono, “Procedure Of Multi Slice Computed Tomography (Msct) Thorax Examination Using Positive Contrast Media With Breast Cancer Case,” JRI (Jurnal Radiogr. Indones., 2021, doi: 10.55451/jri.v4i1.78.
I. Borodyansky, “Decision support system in radiology for fast diagnostics of thoracic diseases under COVID-19 pandemic conditions,” CARDIOMETRY, 2022, doi: 10.18137/cardiometry.2022.21.5054.
A. Hendin, S. Koenig, and S. Millington, “Better with Ultrasound: Thoracic Ultrasound.,” Chest, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.052.
F. Luan, J. Zhang, K. Mak, Z.-H. Liu, and H. Wang, “Low Radiation X-rays: Benefiting People Globally by Reducing Cancer Risks,” Int. J. Med. Sci., vol. 18, pp. 73–80, 2021, doi: 10.7150/ijms.48050.
R. Faulkner and P. Lockwood, “Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction,” Radiogr. Open, 2022, doi: 10.7577/radopen.5004.
L. E. Lampignano, J., & Kendrick, Bontrager’s textbook of radiographic positioning and related anatomy - E-book: Bontrager’s textbook of radiographic positioning and related anatomy - E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2020.
M. Saada, E. Sanchez-Jimenez, and A. Roguin, “Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern?,” Europace, vol. 25, pp. 270–276, 2022, doi: 10.1093/europace/euac158.
P. Tomà et al., “Protecting sensitive patient groups from imaging using ionizing radiation: effects during pregnancy, in fetal life and childhood,” Radiol. Med., pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01034-8.
S. A. F. Ahmed, “Management of occupational exposure for pregnant employee in diagnostic radiology,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., 2021, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2021.12.3.0663.
K. Alzyoud, B. Snaith, P. Hogg, and A. England, “The complete evaluation of tube potential on clinical image quality when using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiography,” J. Med. Radiat. Sci., vol. 67, pp. 360–361, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jmrs.429.
N. Peacock, A. Steward, and P. Riley, “An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs,” J. Med. Radiat. Sci., vol. 67, pp. 260–268, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jmrs.403.
M. G. Meena, “Physics guided machine learning for multi-material decomposition of tissues from dual-energy CT scans of simulated breast models with calcifications,” IS and T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 11. 2023. doi: 10.2352/EI.2023.35.11.HPCI-228.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Hasmy, Ahmad Hariri Sokhibi, Hanna Fidya Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
